Authentic Assessment Toolbox
created by Jon Mueller

What is Authentic Assessment? Why Do It? How Do You Do It?

 

Home > Examples > Tasks & Rubrics > English


The Crossing Essay

Your assignment is to write a five-paragraph essay. It should be typed, double-spaced, and grammatically correct. You can pick one of the following topics:

1) Write about three (3) characteristics Manny has that helped him survive on the streets of Juarez for so long. List specific examples from the book to support each characteristic.

2) Write about three (3) characteristics that would make Sgt. Locke a "hero." List specific examples from the book to support your statements.

Your essay must have an attention getter and a thesis as part of a well-developed introductory paragraph. In addition, make sure that all of your body paragraphs have topic, supporting, and concluding sentences. The last paragraph of your essay needs to be the conclusion, where you will restate your thesis.

Outline due on ______ ( I must approve your outline before you start writing your rough draft)

Rough draft due on ______ (We will be peer-editing in class)

Final draft due on ______

 

The Crossing Essay Rubric

This essay is worth 30 points, divided up into five categories. The categories are focus, support/ elaboration, organization, conventions, and integration.

Category
Score
Comments (Peer Editing)
Focus

6
5
4
3
2
1



Support/ Elaboration
6
5
4
3
2
1


Organization
6
5
4
3
2
1


Conventions
6
5
4
3
2
1


Integration

6
5
4
3
2
1



Additional Comments:

 

Final Draft

To earn a "6" --

  • Focus: thesis statement must be clear and preview all main points, attention getter must clearly introduce the topic
  • Support/ Elaboration: all major points are detailed with specifics and credible facts
  • Organization: all good paragraphs with main points connected; good transitions between paragraphs
  • Conventions: no major grammatical or mechanical errors
  • Integration: all features of good and effective writing present; well-developed essay

To earn a "5" --

  • Focus: thesis statement clear, gives general preview of main points, attention getter could do a little better job of introducing topic
  • Support/ Elaboration: most major points are detailed with specifics and credible facts
  • Organization: mostly good paragraphs with main points connected; OK transitions between paragraphs
  • Conventions: one or two major grammatical or mechanical errors, few minor
  • Integration: most features of good writing present, but not all equally developed

To earn a "4" --

  • Focus: thesis statement clear, gives vague preview of main points, attention getter could do a lot better job of introducing topic
  • Support/ Elaboration: some major points are detailed with specifics and credible facts
  • Organization: some good paragraphs with main points connected; minor digressions, transitions between paragraphs need work
  • Conventions: a few major grammatical or mechanical errors, some minor
  • Integration: essentials of good writing present

To earn a "3" --

  • Focus: thesis statement not really clear, does not preview main points very well, attention getter is lackluster
  • Support/ Elaboration: most major points are general, some not credible
  • Organization: bad paragraphing, major digressions, few transitions between paragraphs
  • Conventions: some major grammatical or mechanical errors, many minor
  • Integration: not all features of effective writing are developed

To earn a "2" --

  • Focus: thesis statement is confusing, shifts and scatters main points, no attention getter
  • Support/ Elaboration: attempted support statements, lists them
  • Organization: weak plan, vague structure
  • Conventions: many major grammatical or mechanical errors, confusing
  • Integration: weak try, confusing

To earn a "1" --

  • Focus: thesis statement unclear, too short
  • Support/ Elaboration: no support, insufficient
  • Organization: no plan, too short
  • Conventions: major confusion, short
  • Integration: most features of effective writing absent, too short

Content Outcomes: 10, 11, 13
Process Outcomes: 16

 


 
Home | What is it? | Why do it? | How do you do it? | Standards | Tasks | Rubrics| Examples | Glossary

Copyright 2018, Jon Mueller. Professor of Psychology, North Central College, Naperville, IL. Comments, questions or suggestions about this website should be sent to the author, Jon Mueller, at jfmueller@noctrl.edu.